Greg explores why he and the AIM team still build a “fat client” today…
Tech Trend I - Why do we still build clients?: “More often these days, I am asked, as to why we still build an instant messaging client here at AOL. I talk to some of my friends at our competitors and apparently they are asked the same thing too.”
This is something I thing long and hard about. Not just as a technology provider, but as a user, especially every time Steve Gillmor would say everyone is dead because Google gives you everything on-line.
My conclusion is that I like desktop applications. Web applications are good also, but full clients often feel better and allow me to be more productive. In a post soon I’ll give personal examples, but I’ll leave this post with the one I think of every time I travel.
Many years ago (could it be 10 years?) United released a Windows application called United Connection. It was a full Win32 app that talked over the Internet to some servers to get data on flights, hotels, cars, and reservations. To this day, I have not found a single travel web site (and I’ve at least done the “search” part on most) that lets me be as productive in finding flights to meet my travel criteria.
It may be possible to do a web based application/site that gives me the same power, but it hasn’t arrived yet. If we have the bandwidth for Flickr and YouTube, why don’t we apply it to the massive of information around flights, aircraft, cities, and other attributes needed to return the power and productivity I had with United Connection?
Desktop apps matter. Desktop apps that use the net effectively maximize productivity. Or maybe I’m just getting old and stuck in my ways.
(Via aimInfo.)
[tags]desktop+apps, aim, united[/tags]